Jul 21, 2016 · Once that happens, code will resume execution at the "catch". If there is a breakpoint within a function that's evaluated as part of a "when", that breakpoint will suspend execution before …

If you re-throw an exception within the catch block, and that exception is caught inside of another catch block, everything executes according to the documentation.

Jul 27, 2014 · 62 You cannot use try-catch statements to handle exceptions thrown asynchronously, as the function has "returned" before any exception is thrown. You should instead use the promise.then …

May 18, 2010 · Finally and catch blocks are quite different: Within the catch block you can respond to the thrown exception. This block is executed only if there is an unhandled exception and the type …

In the second scheme, if the promise p rejects, then the .catch() handler is called. If you return a normal value or a promise that eventually resolves from the .catch() handler (thus "handling" the error), then …

Nope, (or ) is 's friend and always there as part of try/catch. However, it is perfectly valid to have them empty, like in your example. In the comments in your example code (If func1 throws error, try func2), …

I recently came across code written by a fellow programmer in which he had a try-catch statement inside a catch! Please forgive my inability to paste the actual code, but what he did was something

Will Try-Catch capture all errors that @@ERROR can? In the following code fragment, is it worthwhile to check for @@ERROR? Will RETURN 1111 ever occur? SET XACT_ABORT ON BEGIN …

Catch will only run if an exception is thrown and the catch block can handle that type of exception. The finally block is the one that will run when the try block is complete.

9 Give me some of your thoughts on which is a better coding practice/makes more efficient code/looks prettier/whatever: Increasing and improving your ability to use if statements to anticipate and catch …